[MSL]

 He or she is giving a good advice -- it's better to improve yourself with some new skills. At least it gives you more chances theoretically.

[MSL]

Comics for Incels

 Is there somebody who can draw comics? I'm a writer and I'd like to create a great incel comics story, but I can't draw.

[MSL]

 And, by the way, if you want to know what would the story be like. 100% Realistic. About the true problems in the incels' life.

[Incel]

So, to be honest, I'm a sort of failed normie (it's a kind of incel, too) or maybe an ex-pretty boy. So...

1. I'm an incel supporter! I feel you guys! (the incels, I mean.)

2. Just a few years ago I had good hair and a young face! And it was enough to get a girlfriend. Now? I got higher degrees, more knowledge, more muscles, more skills, and... no more females to like me... So? How to keep the faith that once you're older and balder you'll be better with your better knowledge, skills, degrees, etc?! Well, it's better than just nothing, but?...

[MSL]

Once a person becomes very bald better to shave all his hair regularly and to be a skinhead fashioned. Wear good hats and caps too. The second thing is to try to get richer. It helps in this capitalistic oriented world. The third point is never stop the good job -- keep learning, keep working, keep training... and keep trying.

[SEO]

"Omega male"

Did you hear about that? "Omega male". "An omega male is a mancel who is at the very bottom of the social totem pole as far as access to mating, sex, money, and other things distributed unevenly in society. This social ineptitude usually extends to almost all areas of his life, including his sexual prowess. The social ineptitude of an omega male usually stems from the fact that he has no confidence in himself as a sexual being, and thus has to rely on external sources of confidence for such purposes. For instance, he may seek to improve his social standing by flirting with other men." ^{https://incels.wiki/w/Omega_male}

How do you think about it?

[MSL]

 I think that it's very rare someone to be a fully omega. Let's say you're the worst in running, but you can be the best in chess. Another example -- one is not good at singing, but he is good at coding.
 Another thing is that even there are some real "omegas" this doesn't make them automatically incels (mancels). Not every omega male is an incel and not every incel is an omega. The reality is that there are some persons who are good enough to be called at least betas (beta males) and they're incels. And also there are some persons who are unlucky and/or lazy enough to be something that many will call it "omega", but still they were capable to find a girl-friend, a wife, a lover. So an "omega male" isn't necessarily a mancel (incel) and an incel isn't necessarily an "omega" ("omega male"). 
 The last thing that I want to add is that there are many other ways and examples about how someone may seek to improve his social standing. (And, in fact, I don't think that becoming a homosexual (gay) or bisexual is "improving the social standing").

[SEO]

Gigachad

It's something comparatively new. Gigachad. What's this? Let's begin with this:
"Gigachad is a Chad who is within the top 0.1% of physical attractiveness and intimidates most men by his muscular physique. Gigachads generally have incredible facial aesthetics and symmetry, tall stature and reached peak physique.

Gigachads mog all other highly attractive males and are taller than average Chad. Gigachad is the extreme opposite of a truecel. An allosexual hetero woman's reaction to seeing the Gigachad is the equivalent to how moths react to a lightbulb.

The female equivalent of Gigachad is Gigastacy." (Edited because of some English language errors. Source: https://incels.wiki/w/Gigachad.)

[MSL]

A simple combination of "giga-" and "Chad". "Giga" has a Greek origin - (γίγας's meaning is "giant"). "Chad" is an alpha male (according to some incels' jargon). Well, so it's, according to those who use this kind of slang, a person who is one of the top Chads.
 Now let me read that explanation above and comment it.
 1. "0.1%"? Sounds possible. Especially nowadays when there are so many obese people and/or people who don't sport at all. Maybe the real percentage of the so-called Gigachads is something close to 0.01% or 0.001%?
 2. "intimidates most men by his muscular physique" is too primitive. Not everyone with a super-muscular physique is that aggressive; not everyone with not that muscular body is weak. In many situations/relationships the psysique isn't that important (for example if the "weak guy" is a boss and the muscular guy is his worker.)
 3. About the so-called "mog" (a.k.a. "mogging" which is a verbification and apheresis of the acronym AMOG = "alpha male of the group") is the act of dominating another person or just being better than that person. So, as we may see, sometimes the other types of males are more attractive (for example some of the so-called "slayers", "pretty boys", etc.)
 4. "An allosexual hetero woman's reaction to seeing the Gigachad is the equivalent to how moths react to a lightbulb." is more or less exaggerated. I know that there are girls and women who afraid of the Gigachad type males and they prefer moderate muscular types; some even like feminine males and there are even those who search for chubby and fatty males. So, I can guess that being so giga- isn't the best option and maybe not more than 40%-45% of the females will choose a Gigachad. 

[SEO]

Guys, it's new for me. What is that "drink water" (watermaxx) thing recently? Sources, origin?

[MSL]

 Watermaxx means usuing water (drinking it) to maximalize your attractiveness (this neologism is a combination of the words "water" and the suffix "-maxx" /a suffix is a special group of letters that appear at the end of words/; others similar are moneymaxx, gymmaxx,statusmaxx, etc.)
 According to some answers it's a sort of meme, which appeared after someone suggested to incels to drink more water in order to become better looking.
 Seriously speaking, it's better to have a good hydratation because it helps your body to be healthier, younger and better looking. Of course just this itself isn't enough for many incels to escape the inceldom, but optimistically speaking the combination of this with other things (the good diet, the right sports, the education, the income and so on) is helpful for many of the incels.
 A short comedy film about the watermaxx  -- "Ascend Step by Step with Mr G!" -- Part 11 ("Ascend via Watermaxx" -- a short comedy film)
 

[Dimitroff]

My favorite so long is moneymaxx.

[Incel]

A study show that "Looks are first". https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-017-0092-x  The Importance of Physical Attractiveness to the Mate Choices of Women and Their Mothers

    Madeleine A. Fugère, Caitlynn Chabot, Kaitlyn Doucette & Alita J. Cousins

Evolutionary Psychological Science volume

This is important to realize:

Men with the most desirable personality profiles were rated more favorably than their counterparts only when they were at least moderately attractive. Unattractive men were never rated as more desirable partners for daughters, even when they possessed the most desirable trait profiles. We conclude that a minimum level of physical attractiveness is a necessity for both women and their mothers and that when women and their parents state that other traits are more important than physical attractiveness, they assume potential mates meet a minimally acceptable standard of physical attractiveness.

Well? Looks are first. If you don't pass the "looks test", you don't get to take any other test.

[MSL]

 It's like "Water is wet." or "Suns are hot."  This "a minimally acceptable standard of physical attractiveness" is like that " a minimally acceptable standard of X attractiveness" ("X" may be psychological, economical, etc.)
 For example, imagine that he's a begger or an insane person. Do you think that just because he's physical attractive they'll accept him in their family if he is a homeless or a crazy one? So, yes, the minimally acceptable standard matters in many fields (areas; spheres; aspects).

[MSL]

The incels calling themselves "sub-human" are wrong

  First of all, the word "sub-human"/"subhuman" is not very correct because it implies that there is something that is human and not that human or something like this. Are there sub-foxes, sub-wolves, sub-elephants, sub-crocodiles, sub-bats or sub-dolphins? Obviously not. There may be smaller, weaker, disabled or ill foxes, wolves, elephants, etc., but they're still foxes, wolves, elephants and so on. That's why "sub-human"/"subhuman" is nothing but a senseless concept (or even worse -- a Nazi concept), which is useless and harmful..
 And here come some concrete examples with people who are 100% human (even above the human average, but I'll not call them "super-human"/"superhuman") and who are provenly (without doubt) heroes in the mankind history because they contributed a lot for its development (even without being "Chads", "Changs", "Chadpreets", "Tyrones" and even many persons today may consider them as "ugly", "normies", "shortcels", "baldcels", etc.):

1. Albert Einstein (height: 5 feet 9 inches) --  a German-born theoretical physicist universally acknowledged to be one of the greatest physicists of all time: .

2. Vladimir Lenin (height 5 feet 5 inches) -- a philosopher, revolutionary, politician who created the biggest country in the mankind history -- the USSR: .

3. Mahatma Gandhi (height: 5 feet 5 inches) -- anti-colonial nationalist, and political ethicist, who employed nonviolent resistance to lead the successful campaign for India's independence from British rule, and in turn inspired movements for civil rights and freedom across the world: .

4. Kurt Huber (height: ?) -- a university professor and resistance fighter with the anti-Nazi group White Rose: ^{By Bundesarchiv, Bild 146II-744 / CC-BY-SA 3.0, CC BY-SA 3.0 de, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=5420160}.

 There are hundreds of examples like these. They're showing us that the physical attributes like hair, height, skin, frame, etc. are not the ones which make you "more human" or "less human". All these are mostly animalish, biological. But a human is something (at least, a bit) beyond other animals and the difference is in its more developed thinking (science, technology, philosophy, etc.) and society. So even you're one of those who are without a partner (girlfriend, boyfriend, lover, husband, wife, or something like these) you're not a "sub-", you're still one of the mankind.

 Author: Geser Kurultaev (a philosopher-anthropologist, author of "How to Escape the Inceldom: A QUICK GUIDE TO Deincelization" -- https://www.amazon.com/How-Escape-Inceldom-QUICK-Deincelization-ebook/dp/B0855FTRZ1)