☯☼☯ SEO and Non-SEO (Science-Education-Omnilogy) Forum ☯☼☯



☆ ☆ ☆ № ➊ Omnilogic Forum + More ☆ ☆ ☆

Your ad here just for $2 per day!

- - -

Your ads here ($2/day)!

Author Topic: Is having good skills or personality much of that big bonus in dating?  (Read 498 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Aquonut

  • SEO sr. member
  • ****
  • Posts: 472
  • SEO-karma: +469/-46
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Email
After researching, I found that there were rare girls who fell for a guy because of his good skills or personality. It seems to me most of the girls were gravitated to a guy because of his face or height or money, and what's more disappointing is that those who fell for because of face or height are of the highest ratio to all of the 'samples'.
We have to admit having good skills, like singing well, writing well, etc., or having a good personality is a bonus, but is it that a big one? I really don't think so. It seems to me your face or height plays the biggest role.
If you have a bad height or face it's really 'joever' for you.
Correct me if I am wrong.

MSL

  • Философ | Philosopher | 哲学家
  • SEO Mod
  • SEO hero member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17758
  • SEO-karma: +823/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Peace, sport, love.
    • View Profile
    • Free word counter
Re: Is having good skills or personality much of that big bonus in dating?
« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2024, 12:56:09 AM »
 If someone thinks that just being skill-maxxed (skills-maxxed) and personality-maxxed is enough for most of the females, it's too optimistic, i. e. around 100% blue-pilled view. Yes, there are unicorns (those rare females and males) who doesn't care at all (or almost) about the looks (face, body) but usually (according to the red-pilled and meta-pilled theories) the case is that you (no matter you're a male or a female) at first should pass the looks threshold and then you have to continue to add up more (the skills, the personality, the knowledge, the capital, etc.)
 The so-called looks threshold is sort of subjective -- for most of the females you don't have to be a Chad-tier if you really have that great personality + the very good skills + the rest (money, property, knowledge, etc.) but there are also those who'll really have the "Chad only" attitude.
 I'd make the house analogy: the skills and the personality are something very necessary for the long-term relationships, so they're like a roof and a window for the house. A roofless and windowless house can't be a good, true house. The face and the body are the foundations (building, house foundations); they are the most crucial structural components in any house or building. Now it's very clear, right? :)
 And at the end, let me say what do I think is (sort of) wrong (almost black-pilled) in the post above: this --
Quote
If you have a bad height or face it's really 'joever' for you.

 1. It depends how bad (from 0 to 10) it is. Well, if you're a 0/10 to 1/10 (face and/or height wise) you'll surely need some hard-maxx help (like surgeries) because in this trueceldom (true inceldom; the inceldom of the truecels) the soft-maxxes aren't enough to pass the threshold. But if you're just a nearcel-tier (3/10), for example, or a low-tier normie (a 4/10, i. e. a Melvin) then even with soft-maxxes you may ascend (gym-maxx, money-maxx, edu-maxx and if it's still not working, a geo-maxx /location-maxx/ will surely solve the problem)!
 2. In some extremely rare cases of giga-maxx (for example, winning $1 000 000; becoming a president; becoming a movie star, etc.) even with 0/10-1/10 truecel qualities (face, body wise) you're surely able to ascend because of the power of very high status (status-maxx, wich in the cases mentioned here is a giga-status-maxx). Well, some people argue that this is nothing more than beta-buxxing but it's a detail because the beta-buxxers (a.k.a. "beta male provider") aren't incels anyway. :)
A fan of science, philosophy and so on. :)

PageRank

  • PageRank fan
  • SEO Admin
  • SEO hero member
  • *****
  • Posts: 599
  • SEO-karma: +187/-0
  • PR (PageRank)
    • View Profile
    • Red moles
Re: Is having good skills or personality much of that big bonus in dating?
« Reply #2 on: February 28, 2024, 01:03:20 AM »
Yeah but how bad? "bad height or face" might be "1.10 meters + 0/10 face" or  "1.67 meters and 6/10 face". You're belonging to the second example (167 cm tall and a face around 6/10) so... thinking about how well you're moneymaxxed (I saw you in the height-maxx forum that you want to spend USD 150 000 for a surgery, holy sh*t  :o ) + edumaxxed, all you need is just to improve your body and to work on your social skills. Then if you don't hit only on Shanghaiese females and you don't mind to try some geomaxx I swear you're married in no time.
PR or PageRank (sometimes: "Page Rank").
 

Alexa

  • Alexa's fan
  • SEO Admin
  • SEO hero member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2048
  • SEO-karma: +450/-0
  • Fan of Alexa Internet
    • View Profile
    • Pretty legs
Re: Is having good skills or personality much of that big bonus in dating?
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2024, 01:58:51 AM »
Joever  ;D... Your English is getting super level up 8) 8) 8) 👍👍👍👍👍😊😎✅

Look, dear, depends on what skills you are talking about and how bad is that height/looks/face issue. What if you have a skill to be a billionaire and to own a casino in Macau? Who then will give a damn about your height/face? 😜

Nadia

  • Сладко миньонче
  • SEO hero member
  • *****
  • Posts: 621
  • SEO-karma: +192/-0
  • Gender: Female
  • Миньонче
    • View Profile
    • СУ
Re: Is having good skills or personality much of that big bonus in dating?
« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2024, 07:13:25 PM »
If your skills and personality are very great like those of Elon Musk then yes. :)
Mieux vaut être seul que mal accompagné.
 

 

Your ad here just for $1 per day!

- - -

Your ads here ($1/day)!

About the privacy policy
How Google uses data when you use our partners’ sites or apps
Post there to report content which violates or infringes your copyright.