[И.]

 This is another difference between us and them: we're ABLE and we CAN say 'sorry' and we can admit our mistakes (if/when there are any). As I mentioned already -- our goals and values are not the force, the dominance, the power -- we're just people, who like the truth, we like to learn, to develop ourselves and to earn some decent money in this hard capitalistic or semi-capitalistic nowadays world.

[И.]

  MisterDave from Voat.co is a spamophobic person -- he thinks that I/we spam even when we clearly and strictly keep the rule, that shows up to 20% own links IS NOT spam. Because he is afraid to debate in PM and he thinks it's also "spam" (I told you -- a spamophobic, not normal person), I'm going to answer him here, from now on. This is the last answer I sent him there, I will repost it here, too:

I think you're the real idiot, because you (all of you) already tried the WHOIS and at first you think I'm a Chinese, then -- I'm a Bulgarian. Lack of brain capacity to see the TEAM behind all this.
Sure, of course, you'll think that Atif banned us right, no matter how well and strict we kept the rule about the 20%! You're subjective.
You PLAY on Voat?!?!?! And you're doing all these efforts FOR FREE?! You really don't value your time.
About the "spirit" -- it was a joke -- every time, when someone CAN'T prove, that we're spammers, because we follow the anti-spam rule and their last hope is to point to some invisible "spirit". Well, it's ridiculous.
**I'm not a spammer, because I kept the rule here, which is very clear. The spammer is only in your head. Wishful thinking, you know? I DIDN'T STEAL ANYTHING, because I gave 80% FREE LABOR HERE! Do you understand HOW HARD is it to post 80% OTHER things in order to get 20% own/related links?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? It's a sort of EXPLOITATION! If it was IN FAIR, it should be 50/50!!! BUT STILL, we didn't complain and we tried to keep the rule! If for you 80% for 20% is still "a theft", you're someone, who is very, very delusional!**
>Oh woe is me, he used a bad word! Waaah wahh wahhh!
OK, if you're so rude, don't complain later, when my language also become adequate to your rudeness! I don't know is it some imperial habit for the anglos to think k only they can attack, invade, etc., and we, the rest have to obey and listen, but I'm not a son of slaves, and I'm ready to protect myself as much as I can!
YOU MADE FAKE REPORTS -- we kept the rule up to 20%, we made a lot of screenshots of this rule and your SPAM accusations are fake as hell! And yes, you did some harm already to us, the innocent honest educated people!
I spam your PM?! Are you INSANE??? Read the SPAM meaning: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/spam **and stop with your spamophobia, you crazy anglo-saxon individual!!!**
FROM NOW ON, you will receive your ANSWERS ONLY IN OUR FORUM, if you are a coward and you don't want PMs.
About the sparring -- you're welcome to China! We are not fans of England and we do not visit that place.

As you know I'm finishing my participation here soon. This is just another person, who wants to deal with me and I deal with him!

MisterDave -- the spamophobic -- exposes my PMs there (in Voat.co, in the v/ReportSpammers).   Then I will expose his in seo-forum-seo-luntan.com, i.e. here. As a coward, he thinks that debate via PM is "spam"... OKAY then, I will stop PM him, because he is reposting my PMs in Voat.co publicly! SO, I started to answer him and exposing his PMs in our website: seo-forum-seo-luntan.com/social-network-seo-social-network/is-voat-co-going-to-be-a-new-internet-leading-website/msg25062/#msg25062 COME AND DEBATE AS A MAN, MisterDave! Don't only here hide yourself behind the downvote brigadeers!!!
 AND HIS PMs now:

Sender: MisterDave | Sent: 2015/9/22 3:59:30
Is that correct, sir?
You may report it for spam if someone spams it.

I haven't spammed it. It's not even 5% of my submissions. It's one of only about 4 sites on the internet with news on that subject so it's hard to avoid linking it. Go ahead and report it as spam if it makes you feel happy, I'm confident your report won't be taken seriously. I've linked both Metro.co.uk and Mirror.co.uk more than narrowboatworld.com, perhaps you should report them too, just so that everyone knows what a total retard you are.

Sender: MisterDave | Sent: 2015/9/22 17:32:23
I answered to your impudent, rude post!!!
Look, I think that an almost 50 years old English man should be POLITE and GENTLEMAN, but you are using rude words, so I ANSWERED YOUR IMPUDENT BEHAVIOR! READ NOW!!!
I see no reason to be polite to thieves and others of moral and intellectual paucity. You're an advertisement thief.

@MisterDave, the real idiot is you, because you're posting publicly the whois info, and I sent you ONLY a PRIVATE message, to ask you about that WHOIS. Do you see the difference?

What difference? The only difference I see is that you had the details of an old man with a hobby news site who has never been on voat, and were imlicitly threatening to release them because you thought it was me.

And don't explain me about the Daily Mirror, please!
Ok, you explain to me, why you thought I was Tom Crossley because I posted links to NBW but you don't think I'm Trinity Mirror Publications because I posted more links to mirror.co.uk

YOUR IDIOTIC SPAM-REPORTER COLLEAGUE @flussence even thinks that iciba.com is ours!!!
He's not a colleague, colleagues are people who have the same employer and share a working environment. he's a web acquaintance, there's a difference. I'm under no obligation to change what he thinks. Don't explain to me about iciba.com please!

AND ALSO -- we're a part of the seo-forum-seo-luntan.com, do you think the website is only mine?!
I don't care if it's only yours, if it's your mother's, if it belongs to your whole special ed class, or if it belongs to the King of Spain. If I see spam, I report spam. If you spam, you get reported.

When someone asks about your links, seems you're getting very sensitive, huh? Only you want to search and report spam? Let people take a closer look to your submissions, don't think you're someone so special!
Please take a closer look at my submissions, there's no spam, you're making yourself look even more stupid than you already looked. If you're going to try and report something as spam you have a moral obligation to get your facts correct as failing to do so might cause harm to third parties. Beyond that caveat, go ahead!

reply  source  delete  mark as read

Sender: MisterDave | Sent: 2015/9/22 17:52:49
And my SECOND answer!
I will never let you to insult and attack us! We have DIGNITY and we will defend ourselves AS LONG AS WE ARE ALIVE!!!
You are a spammer, spam is theft. You are a lowlife thief, there's no dignity in stealing for a living. Also, I appear to be insulting you with impunity, which means you're wrong again.

READ IT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!! P.P.S. @MisterDave, I think nearly 50 years old Englishman should be a gentleman, but you're using rude, offensive words,
Oh woe is me, he used a bad word! Waaah wahh wahhh!

For f's sake, grow up.

so it's my time for a reciprocal answer to you: **moron, you are posting publicly my WHOIS
I linked the whois for a spamvertised domain. No harm in that. If there had been no spam for that domain it would never have been linked.

, I only asked you in PM (it means PRIVATE message, if you didn't know it, stupid dick!!!) is that info correct. I sent A QUESTION to YOU,
I never solicited your question, you are spamming my private messages. You've been asked to stop PM'ing me (it means PRIVATE message, if you didn't know it, stupid dick!!!) but you didn't stop so you don't get any say in what I do with those messages. All your PM's to me will now be posted in /v/reportspammers. Keep digging yourself that hole!

you're EXPOSING our WHOIS publicly here to all the voaters, even when we keep the RULE 2 of 10!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You don't keep rule 2 of 10, you abuse the rules and treat them as a how to spam guide.

Do you realize the difference, crazy and stupid man?
Difference between what? Your spam is just spam, no different, just ordinary theft-of-advertising and trespass against a chattal.

You ask me to do something about you?!?!?!? Like what? Any ideas? @georgi NEVER refuses sparrings, for example. If you're in a good shape, you're welcome to visit him. **
It's you who keeps PM'ing me. If you want to spar, get yourself to England and then tell me where to meet you, I'll meet you in any boxing ring, dojo, car park, or I know some nice remote places up on the moors where we won't be disturbed! Otherwise, stop spamming and stop PM'ing me (it means PRIVATE message, if you didn't know it, stupid dick!!!).

reply  source  delete  mark as read

Sender: MisterDave | Sent: 2015/9/22 18:10:16
Is that correct, sir?
The spam reports here are a joke! Atif even ban WRONG sites and Atif didn't keep his own rules!
The spam reports are a joke because Atko doesn't ban fast enough, and because the site doesn't do enough types of ban. I told Atko this would be a problem for him about a year ago. The only wrong ban I've seen him make is a domain he mistook for a url shortener, an easy mistake to make and not one that prevents anyone posting content.

You keep the rules, but you don't keep the spirit of Voat. LOL! Sounds familiar?
Sounds familiar as you, but I don't know why you're saying it to me, you're becoming incoherent. If you're trying to say I'm gaming the 20% guideline you'll have to show where, the only domain making a substantial percentage of my posts is voat.co but you already knew that.

The retard is YOU, because you lose your time to report and to insult people WITHOUT earning anything.
I'm earning money while I'm playing on voat, my employer pays me for a full weeks work even when there is no work. You should not jump to conclusions, you keep getting it wrong.

I only wanted to show you that we also can see WHOIS and we're also able to send spam reports!
I'm sure you can, but you can't actually target the right person or domain name. Idiot.

reply  source  delete  mark as read

In the subverse "ReportSpammers" in Voat that MisterDave posted that I don't understand; I'm "a classic example of spammer logic." Nothing special, right? He is a person with phobia (spamophobia), so for him it's an expected beginning.
 Later he puts some interesting to debate question: Why would someone links to a site, if he or she doesn't get paid for it?
 I think, when it comes to linkS (plural), then it's better to safe sometime and not to link for free. This is a thinking of a webmaster, not of a spammer. Not every spammer get paid for his/her links. Many people spam, without earning anything.
 Then MisterDave explains that he's stupid because he's not getting paid for reporting me. Yes, it's right, he got me (got it; understood it) right. At least as a meaning. It's VERY STUPID to work for free (even, if this "work" is to report spammers and to send FAKE reports /for example in our case, because we kept well the anti-spam rule, that allows anybody to post up to 20% own or related to him/her links.../). I respect the volunteers' job, when it comes to something big and social like poor people, ill people, clean city, etc. I don't respect working for free for some private person/-s in their private website. It's like an exploitation -- they use your labor, but they don't pay you anything. I even felt that 20% for 80% is also a kind of exploitation, but we tried to imagine it's not so bad, it's 'in fair', etc. In fact, in fair is 50/50 -- 50% you contribute and 50% you get some profit/benefit/payment/etc., isn't it? Isn't it?
 MisterDave thinks that only in the "spammer logic" "everything has to be about money." He has no idea, that in the nowadays capitalistic (or almost capitalistic) world the money are very important? He has no idea, that working for free is like a slave labour (even the slaves can get some food, water, etc. for their labour...)? Why he loses his time and labour for free? "Time is money!" -- you know that! Oh, I remember another one from Britain there, who was very proud that works for free something and then when it came to need money for a hobby and no money, started to post questions about how to get this money from her mother. So, probably, if someday that MisterDave needs money for something and HAS NOT money, then he will start to think otherwise: why, the hell, I didn't use my time to earn money and I spent my time, efforts, energy, etc. for nothing?
 About that site -- he thinks it is actually one of only three or four sites in the world with regular news articles on the "extremely niche" subject of narrowboating and no paywall and it would be very difficult to find content for /v/narrowboats without repeatedly linking to that site. Well, as I see, when it's about his own linking, then MisterDave is ready to "repeatedly linking" to one and the same site. But, when it's about us -- even keeping the rule, no way! Subjectiveness, selfishness and lack of empathy.

[MSL]

 Oh-wow! Our English is getting better!

[MSL]

 I saw already that this terrible MisterDave from Voat.co, thinks that participating there according to the rule about the permission to post links of yours up to 20% is "criminal", and now he call us again in this way, so I will answer to this:

• stupid
• rude

Englishman here:


"I see no reason to be polite to thieves and others of moral and intellectual paucity. You're an advertisement thief."
 1. Crazy brain, you're not polite at all! I saw your rude answers to other people, so it's not only in our case! Don't lie!!!
 2. According to your stupid brain, people who post there 80% other links + additional work (like non-link content) and ONLY 20% own links are thieves? Insane, stupid man! It's a form of a classical capitalist exploitation!!! We're the ones who can feel someone steal our time and labor!!! But, we're not so stingy and we decided to keep this rule!!! And you calling us -- the hard-working people "thieves"?! Go to hell, ill capitalistic brain!
 3. What advertisement? Do you see ANY advertisement in Voat.co now?!?!?!?! We even offered to the community there to think about ads, and we got critiques!!! Sick person... Go to hell with your imaginary "advertisement thief"!

 "What difference? The only difference I see is that you had the details of an old man with a hobby news site who has never been on voat, and were imlicitly threatening to release them because you thought it was me."
 4. Oh, the imagination of the spamophobic makes him to see "implicitly" threatening! Typical psychological projection! No words to explain how sick I'm of this double-standarded phobia-man!

"Ok, you explain to me, why you thought I was Tom Crossley because I posted links to NBW but you don't think I'm Trinity Mirror Publications because I posted more links to mirror.co.uk"
 5. We think that you post that website too much! And, because you used WHOIS data to post publicly about this website, we sent you ONLY a simple PM to ask you are that websites' WHOIS data correct and we expected a decent answer, not a hysterical drama! You're getting very, very nervous, when it comes to your links, right? Abnormal man...

Oh, yes, YOUR IDIOTIC SPAM-REPORTER COLLEAGUE @flussence even thinks that some big, popular websites are ours, because we add some links there! And you're okay with that, right? Just because it's against us? Why don't you started to explain how it's not necessary he to be right in that case?

"He's not a colleague, colleagues are people who have the same employer and share a working environment. he's a web acquaintance, there's a difference. I'm under no obligation to change what he thinks."
 6. Oh, thank you for explaining us how you don't understand the whole meaning of the word "colleagues": READ HERE NOW --

Colleagues are those explicitly united in a common purpose and respecting each other's abilities to work toward that purpose.

^{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collegiality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License}
 You're under no obligation to do anything, as long as you haven't simple moral rules and at least a little bit empathy! You're just a selfish, stone hearted person with a very, very big phobia problem.

"If I see spam, I report spam. If you spam, you get reported."
 7. Including fake reports, based on your delusional spam understanding and/or hallucinations? Crazy, spamophobic individual!


"Please take a closer look at my submissions, there's no spam, you're making yourself look even more stupid than you already looked. If you're going to try and report something as spam you have a moral obligation to get your facts correct as failing to do so might cause harm to third parties."
 8. AND THIS COMES FROM A PERSON, WHO ALREADY REPORTED US (WE WERE falsely accused by you!!!)... Where are your moral obligations?! Where are your facts? Where is your sense of responsibility for the harms you made to us?!

[И.]

"Please take a closer look at my submissions, there's no spam, you're making yourself look even more stupid than you already looked. If you're going to try and report something as spam you have a moral obligation to get your facts correct as failing to do so might cause harm to third parties."
 8. AND THIS COMES FROM A PERSON, WHO ALREADY REPORTED US (WE WERE falsely accused by you!!!)... Where are your moral obligations?! Where are your facts? Where is your sense of responsibility for the harms you made to us?!

What a hypocrite!

[Alexa]

 I feel sorry for those, who had/have to deal with all this...

[И.]

 Now I haven't problems and I can post it from my account here. No need of the local Alexa's help.    Let's add in the list Tipman79 (the Canadian alcoholic, insulter, stalker, downvote brigading liar) and flussence (crazy person, who is stalking, sending criminal threads, downvote brigading, sending fake spam floods, innuendos...)
 So far we informed via PM, that we will answer them here: MisterDave, nadrewod, Tipman79 and flussence from Voat.co.
 And now my answers:
1. flussence, I think you're a schizophrenic, so you have to take your medications. I haven't "limited vocabulary". I'm just not a native English speaker and I can't use 100% of my vocabulary in English.  Your intelligence is very, very low.
 If we're to assume you projects half as much with your insults, slurs, fake reports, flood, etc. as you do with your spamophobia, lies, etc. posts, then you're just a very, extremely ill person. Mentally...
 I count in grams and kilograms. You mentioned 400lbs. I saw it means 181.4369 kg. (according to this here: http://www.answers.com/Q/How_many_kilograms_in_400_lbs). Well, I'm not so heavy, but I'm in a pretty good shape.
 About this your conclusion about me: "and into farm animal bestiality with a little bit of scat, necrophilia and chinese satanic rituals on the side.", I ensure you that it's just some of your schizophrenic hallucinations. Don't trust them!

2. Tipman79 lies that I "also likes it when you call him a fag". What a lie, what a stupidity. But now wonders, when it comes from a degraded alcoholic with a lack of dignity and a stupid coward. Right?

[И.]

Now I haven't problems and I can post it from my account here. No need of the local Alexa's help.    Let's add in the list Tipman79 (the Canadian alcoholic, insulter, stalker, downvote brigading liar) and flussence (crazy person, who is stalking, sending criminal threads, downvote brigading, sending fake spam floods, innuendos...)
 So far we informed via PM, that we will answer them here: MisterDave, nadrewod, Tipman79 and flussence from Voat.co.
 And now my answers:
1. flussence, I think you're a schizophrenic, so you have to take your medications. I haven't "limited vocabulary". I'm just not a native English speaker and I can't use 100% of my vocabulary in English.  Your intelligence is very, very low.
 If we're to assume you projects half as much with your insults, slurs, fake reports, flood, etc. as you do with your spamophobia, lies, etc. posts, then you're just a very, extremely ill person. Mentally...
 I count in grams and kilograms. You mentioned 400lbs. I saw it means 181.4369 kg. (according to this here: http://www.answers.com/Q/How_many_kilograms_in_400_lbs). Well, I'm not so heavy, but I'm in a pretty good shape.
 About this your conclusion about me: "and into farm animal bestiality with a little bit of scat, necrophilia and chinese satanic rituals on the side.", I ensure you that it's just some of your schizophrenic hallucinations. Don't trust them!

2. Tipman79 lies that I "also likes it when you call him a fag". What a lie, what a stupidity. But now wonders, when it comes from a degraded alcoholic with a lack of dignity and a stupid coward. Right?

Another answer to the alcoholic and degraded Tipman79 from Voat.co. I saw that in another thread he insists that I'm "a fag". I think it's some of his delusions and/or a psychological projection. I am a straight man. It makes you angry? Oh, it's not easy to be a stupid Canadian alcoholic, who admits that he just has a really shitty bio. Such a loser!!!

[Alexa]

 Glad to help, when I can. Btw, I like how flussence admits that Voat has "a disproportionately large share of mentally ill people." The guy know it! He is so impressive!

[И.]

Glad to help, when I can. Btw, I like how flussence admits that Voat has "a disproportionately large share of mentally ill people." The guy know it! He is so impressive!

He-he! "An Error Has Occurred!
Sorry, you can't repeat a karma action without waiting 24 hours."

[И.]

  He is making some new desperate lies/innuendoes in v/whatever and I'm going to response to this here:
 1. "In all seriousness, he's a completely autistic lolcow."

 In all seriousness, flussence is a completely ignorant schizophrenic (or at least a psychopath). He has no idea what is "autistic" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism_spectrum)and he admits that he has social anxiety (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_anxiety_disorder). Also he is the one, who sent criminal threads, floods of fake spam reports, innuendoes, etc.


 2. "Doesn't understand sarcasm, satire or any form of wit."

I understand them and I even learned about them, but yours (if there are any) are idiotic, psychopathic...

 3. "So easy to drive up the wall. Imagine most of SBBH's posts, but taken out of context and 100% deathly serious all of the time."

 Oh, really? Imagine most of the brain of flussence is ill brain. Very serious problem.

 4. "He's so fucking obnoxious he and his alts are the only people ever banned from SBBH for non-ironic reasons."

 Haha. Argumentum ad ban in some SBBH shitpost subverse? Sounds legit!

 5. "And he totally deserves it for: spamming this entire site for a month straight, making approximately a dozen whiny threads per sub he got banned from, abusing the system to hide from downvotes, declaring he's LEEVING 4EVA OMG with another flood of a dozen threads, then staying to continue spamming regardless."

 Insane person!
a) I/we didn't spam, because we kept the rule up to 2/10. This rule is simple, short and clear in voat.co/help/faq: "To be on the safe side, if you submit 10 links to various subverses on Voat, at most 2 of the 10 submitted links may be to the sites you are associated with."
b) Whiny is what you're trying to make. You are desperate and you're seeking for every chance to organize something against me/us. After the downvote brigading is not working as you imagined, now you're trying to convince mamwad from Voat.co to give our subs "the mamwad makeover next"... Idiotism and psychopathism.
c) The one who is abusing the system is not the one, who hides from the downvotes, but the one, who is doing the DOWNVOTE BRIGADES, psycho!
d) LOL! We almost left. No more contributing for Voat.co. We only finish some answers and some reposts and making some screenshots. We're done!
 
 6. "The middle one was what started this shit tornado by being a little bitch on FPH and whining around the rest of the site."
 Sure, the ill brain flussence didn't get it. The little bitch was the insulter Harry_Areola, who broke the peace rule there. Then the main admin banned us and sent us mother insults. As people with mothers who are not alive, we had to react to this in some way. But person (crazy person), without any morals like you surely can't get it.

7. "Then a few days later the first one shows up defending him (in the same broken english) and a few people connected the dots to figure out they've been SEO-spamming the shit out of this place."

 We're relatives and colleagues. Of course we can cooperate in this honest way. I don't see something wrong.
 About the spam -- we never spam, because we kept the up to 20% rule mentioned above.
 This website is not just an SEO website, it's an omnilogy international forum -- one of the leading websites in the world. Check this out: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/seo-forum-seo-luntan.com#trafficstats

 8. "The pair of them instantly went nuclear and somewhere in the middle of it the third sockpuppet showed up defending them."

 We defend each other, when we're right. At the same time we're people with dignity and we may say 'sorry' (as we did) every time, when it is necessary.

 9. "They all use identical tactics, which leads most of us to think they're actually one person."

 Well, we suggested many times to organize a Video Conference in Skype, but the cowards like flussence never accepted this good idea!

[MSL]

  He is making some new desperate lies/innuendoes in v/whatever and I'm going to response to this here:
 1. "In all seriousness, he's a completely autistic lolcow."

 In all seriousness, flussence is a completely ignorant schizophrenic (or at least a psychopath). He has no idea what is "autistic" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism_spectrum)and he admits that he has social anxiety (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_anxiety_disorder). Also he is the one, who sent criminal threads, floods of fake spam reports, innuendoes, etc.


 2. "Doesn't understand sarcasm, satire or any form of wit."

I understand them and I even learned about them, but yours (if there are any) are idiotic, psychopathic...

 3. "So easy to drive up the wall. Imagine most of SBBH's posts, but taken out of context and 100% deathly serious all of the time."

 Oh, really? Imagine most of the brain of flussence is ill brain. Very serious problem.

 4. "He's so fucking obnoxious he and his alts are the only people ever banned from SBBH for non-ironic reasons."

 Haha. Argumentum ad ban in some SBBH shitpost subverse? Sounds legit!

 5. "And he totally deserves it for: spamming this entire site for a month straight, making approximately a dozen whiny threads per sub he got banned from, abusing the system to hide from downvotes, declaring he's LEEVING 4EVA OMG with another flood of a dozen threads, then staying to continue spamming regardless."

 Insane person!
a) I/we didn't spam, because we kept the rule up to 2/10. This rule is simple, short and clear in voat.co/help/faq: "To be on the safe side, if you submit 10 links to various subverses on Voat, at most 2 of the 10 submitted links may be to the sites you are associated with."
b) Whiny is what you're trying to make. You are desperate and you're seeking for every chance to organize something against me/us. After the downvote brigading is not working as you imagined, now you're trying to convince mamwad from Voat.co to give our subs "the mamwad makeover next"... Idiotism and psychopathism.
c) The one who is abusing the system is not the one, who hides from the downvotes, but the one, who is doing the DOWNVOTE BRIGADES, psycho!
d) LOL! We almost left. No more contributing for Voat.co. We only finish some answers and some reposts and making some screenshots. We're done!
 
 6. "The middle one was what started this shit tornado by being a little bitch on FPH and whining around the rest of the site."
 Sure, the ill brain flussence didn't get it. The little bitch was the insulter Harry_Areola, who broke the peace rule there. Then the main admin banned us and sent us mother insults. As people with mothers who are not alive, we had to react to this in some way. But person (crazy person), without any morals like you surely can't get it.

7. "Then a few days later the first one shows up defending him (in the same broken english) and a few people connected the dots to figure out they've been SEO-spamming the shit out of this place."

 We're relatives and colleagues. Of course we can cooperate in this honest way. I don't see something wrong.
 About the spam -- we never spam, because we kept the up to 20% rule mentioned above.
 This website is not just an SEO website, it's an omnilogy international forum -- one of the leading websites in the world. Check this out: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/seo-forum-seo-luntan.com#trafficstats

 8. "The pair of them instantly went nuclear and somewhere in the middle of it the third sockpuppet showed up defending them."

 We defend each other, when we're right. At the same time we're people with dignity and we may say 'sorry' (as we did) every time, when it is necessary.

 9. "They all use identical tactics, which leads most of us to think they're actually one person."

 Well, we suggested many times to organize a Video Conference in Skype, but the cowards like flussence never accepted this good idea!

He (flussence) even has no idea what is the difference between  spam, off-topic, shitpost, etc. (About the last term you may learn online: http://global.bing.com/search?q=shitpost&qs=n&pq=shitpost&sc=8-7&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=2b35a551df05434ba72020c663212874&setmkt=en-us&setlang=en-us&FORM=SECNEN )... a serious psycho case, isn't he?

[И.]

 Yes, and now to add some info about our communication with mamwad from Voat.co. I sent him a link to these explanations here and another one to the Voat.co subverse explanations. The person answered that sending him two PMs within an hour of each other isn't helping our "case". My polite response was: "Look, I gave you 2 DIFFERENT sources of information, because I respected your right to know the truth. I do apologies, if you felt it like abuse or any other kind of discomfort. We're a team of scientists, based in China and Europe and all we wish is a win-win communication. We haven't a "case" here. We already limited our participation here and we're leaving soon. Do what you think is right. Best wishes from us!"
 I hope he'll understand it, but if he can't or will not to... I don't think it's a big problem.

[Alexa]

  He is making some new desperate lies/innuendoes in v/whatever and I'm going to response to this here:
 1. "In all seriousness, he's a completely autistic lolcow."

 In all seriousness, flussence is a completely ignorant schizophrenic (or at least a psychopath). He has no idea what is "autistic" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism_spectrum)and he admits that he has social anxiety (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_anxiety_disorder). Also he is the one, who sent criminal threads, floods of fake spam reports, innuendoes, etc.


 2. "Doesn't understand sarcasm, satire or any form of wit."

I understand them and I even learned about them, but yours (if there are any) are idiotic, psychopathic...

 3. "So easy to drive up the wall. Imagine most of SBBH's posts, but taken out of context and 100% deathly serious all of the time."

 Oh, really? Imagine most of the brain of flussence is ill brain. Very serious problem.

 4. "He's so fucking obnoxious he and his alts are the only people ever banned from SBBH for non-ironic reasons."

 Haha. Argumentum ad ban in some SBBH shitpost subverse? Sounds legit!

 5. "And he totally deserves it for: spamming this entire site for a month straight, making approximately a dozen whiny threads per sub he got banned from, abusing the system to hide from downvotes, declaring he's LEEVING 4EVA OMG with another flood of a dozen threads, then staying to continue spamming regardless."

 Insane person!
a) I/we didn't spam, because we kept the rule up to 2/10. This rule is simple, short and clear in voat.co/help/faq: "To be on the safe side, if you submit 10 links to various subverses on Voat, at most 2 of the 10 submitted links may be to the sites you are associated with."
b) Whiny is what you're trying to make. You are desperate and you're seeking for every chance to organize something against me/us. After the downvote brigading is not working as you imagined, now you're trying to convince mamwad from Voat.co to give our subs "the mamwad makeover next"... Idiotism and psychopathism.
c) The one who is abusing the system is not the one, who hides from the downvotes, but the one, who is doing the DOWNVOTE BRIGADES, psycho!
d) LOL! We almost left. No more contributing for Voat.co. We only finish some answers and some reposts and making some screenshots. We're done!
 
 6. "The middle one was what started this shit tornado by being a little bitch on FPH and whining around the rest of the site."
 Sure, the ill brain flussence didn't get it. The little bitch was the insulter Harry_Areola, who broke the peace rule there. Then the main admin banned us and sent us mother insults. As people with mothers who are not alive, we had to react to this in some way. But person (crazy person), without any morals like you surely can't get it.

7. "Then a few days later the first one shows up defending him (in the same broken english) and a few people connected the dots to figure out they've been SEO-spamming the shit out of this place."

 We're relatives and colleagues. Of course we can cooperate in this honest way. I don't see something wrong.
 About the spam -- we never spam, because we kept the up to 20% rule mentioned above.
 This website is not just an SEO website, it's an omnilogy international forum -- one of the leading websites in the world. Check this out: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/seo-forum-seo-luntan.com#trafficstats

 8. "The pair of them instantly went nuclear and somewhere in the middle of it the third sockpuppet showed up defending them."

 We defend each other, when we're right. At the same time we're people with dignity and we may say 'sorry' (as we did) every time, when it is necessary.

 9. "They all use identical tactics, which leads most of us to think they're actually one person."

 Well, we suggested many times to organize a Video Conference in Skype, but the cowards like flussence never accepted this good idea!

He (flussence) even has no idea what is the difference between  spam, off-topic, shitpost, etc. (About the last term you may learn online: http://global.bing.com/search?q=shitpost&qs=n&pq=shitpost&sc=8-7&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=2b35a551df05434ba72020c663212874&setmkt=en-us&setlang=en-us&FORM=SECNEN )... a serious psycho case, isn't he?

He has a crazy idea, that even people who keep the current anti-spam rules are... 'SEO spammers'. Pity boy.

[И.]

  He is making some new desperate lies/innuendoes in v/whatever and I'm going to response to this here:
 1. "In all seriousness, he's a completely autistic lolcow."

 In all seriousness, flussence is a completely ignorant schizophrenic (or at least a psychopath). He has no idea what is "autistic" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism_spectrum)and he admits that he has social anxiety (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_anxiety_disorder). Also he is the one, who sent criminal threads, floods of fake spam reports, innuendoes, etc.


 2. "Doesn't understand sarcasm, satire or any form of wit."

I understand them and I even learned about them, but yours (if there are any) are idiotic, psychopathic...

 3. "So easy to drive up the wall. Imagine most of SBBH's posts, but taken out of context and 100% deathly serious all of the time."

 Oh, really? Imagine most of the brain of flussence is ill brain. Very serious problem.

 4. "He's so fucking obnoxious he and his alts are the only people ever banned from SBBH for non-ironic reasons."

 Haha. Argumentum ad ban in some SBBH shitpost subverse? Sounds legit!

 5. "And he totally deserves it for: spamming this entire site for a month straight, making approximately a dozen whiny threads per sub he got banned from, abusing the system to hide from downvotes, declaring he's LEEVING 4EVA OMG with another flood of a dozen threads, then staying to continue spamming regardless."

 Insane person!
a) I/we didn't spam, because we kept the rule up to 2/10. This rule is simple, short and clear in voat.co/help/faq: "To be on the safe side, if you submit 10 links to various subverses on Voat, at most 2 of the 10 submitted links may be to the sites you are associated with."
b) Whiny is what you're trying to make. You are desperate and you're seeking for every chance to organize something against me/us. After the downvote brigading is not working as you imagined, now you're trying to convince mamwad from Voat.co to give our subs "the mamwad makeover next"... Idiotism and psychopathism.
c) The one who is abusing the system is not the one, who hides from the downvotes, but the one, who is doing the DOWNVOTE BRIGADES, psycho!
d) LOL! We almost left. No more contributing for Voat.co. We only finish some answers and some reposts and making some screenshots. We're done!
 
 6. "The middle one was what started this shit tornado by being a little bitch on FPH and whining around the rest of the site."
 Sure, the ill brain flussence didn't get it. The little bitch was the insulter Harry_Areola, who broke the peace rule there. Then the main admin banned us and sent us mother insults. As people with mothers who are not alive, we had to react to this in some way. But person (crazy person), without any morals like you surely can't get it.

7. "Then a few days later the first one shows up defending him (in the same broken english) and a few people connected the dots to figure out they've been SEO-spamming the shit out of this place."

 We're relatives and colleagues. Of course we can cooperate in this honest way. I don't see something wrong.
 About the spam -- we never spam, because we kept the up to 20% rule mentioned above.
 This website is not just an SEO website, it's an omnilogy international forum -- one of the leading websites in the world. Check this out: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/seo-forum-seo-luntan.com#trafficstats

 8. "The pair of them instantly went nuclear and somewhere in the middle of it the third sockpuppet showed up defending them."

 We defend each other, when we're right. At the same time we're people with dignity and we may say 'sorry' (as we did) every time, when it is necessary.

 9. "They all use identical tactics, which leads most of us to think they're actually one person."

 Well, we suggested many times to organize a Video Conference in Skype, but the cowards like flussence never accepted this good idea!

He (flussence) even has no idea what is the difference between  spam, off-topic, shitpost, etc. (About the last term you may learn online: http://global.bing.com/search?q=shitpost&qs=n&pq=shitpost&sc=8-7&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=2b35a551df05434ba72020c663212874&setmkt=en-us&setlang=en-us&FORM=SECNEN )... a serious psycho case, isn't he?

He has a crazy idea, that even people who keep the current anti-spam rules are... 'SEO spammers'. Pity boy.

Ha-ha-ha-ha! In the same thread in v/SoapboxBanhammer/ where he again calls us "SEO spammers", he posted that he is not sure whether to feel honored or sodomized. Ambivalence! Schizophrenical!