☯☼☯ SEO and Non-SEO (Science-Education-Omnilogy) Forum ☯☼☯



☆ ☆ ☆ № ➊ Omnilogic Forum + More ☆ ☆ ☆

Your ad here just for $2 per day!

- - -

Your ads here ($2/day)!

Author Topic: Google Scholar's algorithm  (Read 1058 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SEO

  • SEO master
  • SEO Admin
  • SEO hero member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7305
  • SEO-karma: +719/-1
  • SEO expert
    • View Profile
    • SEO
Google Scholar's algorithm
« on: May 24, 2016, 04:56:02 AM »

About the Google Scholar's algorithm


Google Scholar(or scholar.google.com) has an algorithm, which is not very good. "Google Scholar ranks results with a combined ranking algorithm in a "way researchers do, weighing the full text of each article, the author, the publication in which the article appears, and how often the piece has been cited in other scholarly literature". Research has shown that Google Scholar puts high weight especially on citation counts and words included in a document's title. As a consequence, the first search results are often highly cited articles."

And here comes the Matthew effect


"Matthew effect — Google Scholar puts high weight on citation counts in its ranking algorithm and therefore is being criticized for strengthening the Matthew effect as highly cited papers appear in top positions they gain more citations while new papers hardly appear in top positions and therefore get less attention by the users of Google Scholar and hence fewer citations."

Source of the 2 quotes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Scholar (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License)

More about the Matthew effect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_effect.

I don't use Google Scholar now. If you live somewhere, where you may use Google without any problem, plus if you use (or used already) Google Scholar, please share here your experience and your opinion, because we mostly like Google and its products, and it will be a real pleasure for us to know something more about it!

MSL

  • Философ | Philosopher | 哲学家
  • SEO hero member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17689
  • SEO-karma: +813/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Peace, sport, love.
    • View Profile
    • Free word counter
Re: Google Scholar's algorithm
« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2016, 05:15:16 AM »
 It's a very bad effect, indeed!
 I'd like to clarify why we don't use it -- it's not because we don't want to, it's because many (most?) of us (the active users currently) are living in PRC, where (already years) Google is banned. So, instead we use Bing, Yahoo, Baidu, Yandex and sometimes -- other SEs (Search engines).
 It'll be interesting to read more opinions from scholars, scientists and other persons, who already are more familiar with scholar.google.com (Google Scholar). :):)
A fan of science, philosophy and so on. :)

Alexa

  • Alexa's fan
  • SEO Admin
  • SEO hero member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2025
  • SEO-karma: +445/-0
  • Fan of Alexa Internet
    • View Profile
    • Pretty legs
Re: Google Scholar's algorithm
« Reply #2 on: May 24, 2016, 05:27:36 AM »
I guess that maybe our dear Mojo has experience with it. If I'm right, I invite him to share his thoughts. 8)

Tags:
 

Your ad here just for $1 per day!

- - -

Your ads here ($1/day)!

About the privacy policy
How Google uses data when you use our partners’ sites or apps
Post there to report content which violates or infringes your copyright.