I don't care about my sexual appeal tbh.
Now it's okay and even useful probably because you need to focus not on your inceldom but on your study (I am sure your parents will agree on this 100% with me.
). But later, for example, when you're 30, 30+, 40, you'll probably start to care and that time you should have everything that you have to have to be an attractive man (this includes the good health and physics because the attractiveness isn't only intellectual, it's also and, often, firstly biological).
I never made myself up well and that is why I never gymmaxxed
Take my advise and start it at least at home (push ups, dumbbells, squats, jumping, sit ups...) because later, when you meet some really attractive girl (who probably will care about the male's body) you'll sorry if you are not fit (gymmaxxed).
Also,
you know that the sport reduces depression, right? And it keeps you healthier, which is the primary goal of the existing.
This "women are naturally authorized to select their couples rather than men because their eggs have more values than sperms" isn't exactly true. The reasons are much deeper and more like:
- women have to born child/children (it's painful and heavy).
- have to think how to raise the kids (may be difficult and troublesome if there is no strong, rich and responsible father).
- have to care more about getting pregnant, getting venereal disease (usually they get it easier than the males due to their anatomy and habits) and so on.
- usually they have more choice (the male:female ratio benefits the women in China and other countries).
- usually they're more picky and do not hurry.
selecting men as if we were just some kind of exhibitions in the showcase
Objectively, isn't it what they should do, if they're wise? For example, if you have a daughter and you love your kid, how you will teach her to select your son-in-law? To pick up some poor, ugly man, or to choose handsome, rich, capable to provide for her and your grandkids? Of course, the care, the morals, too, but usually, the parents also do support these choices: "To have a high salary, to have good home, to drive a car, to be a giver." This is how it is. Nobody wants to deal with losers, everyone is greedy for a better life.
And, yes, there are more and more greedy women, especially in the megapolises like Shanghai. If you're not rich, you just can't have a wife. Classes... that's it. Marxism explains it well.
Misogyny
Misogyny (as other hate-oriented attitudes) is useless. It reminds me those useless anti-Jew or anti-Japanese attitudes --
there are guys, who instead to earn RMB 2 or to learn what's "tribalism" ("部落习性"), or to add 30 push-ups to their daily routine exercises,
they'll just spend hours of speaking against some group of people like: Jews, Japanese, Turkish, females, gays, feminists, etc. and when they need money, knowledge and good body, they have none.
I just want to be a ffffffffffffffffffff great professor
That's admirable. (I do value it and I think all of the intellectual oriented males and females will do the same.) You're a precious person because there aren't so many young people like you who wants to be a professor of psychometrics.
I am serious -- it's something that all people should value and admire! But what about your goal to become a Chad-tier male? Only with edumaxx you can't do it. You need a solid gymmaxx for this.
You see, even the schoolboys in Norway are big and tall, without gymmaxx you're going to feel mogged a lot:
When I was your age I also thought that it's enough to be a good man, to learn well and to have a good job in order females to like me. 100% bluepilled attitude. Later I found out that without looks (at least good body) the chances are dramatically less (the redpill knowledge). Then I made more research and I found out the other factors (race, place, economy, capital, etc.) and now, from a metapill point of view, I am saying that the best way is a person to keep the socialist ideal: develop all your sides -- brain, body, status, skills... only knowledge and spiritual isn't enough nowadays.