☯☼☯ SEO and Non-SEO (Science-Education-Omnilogy) Forum ☯☼☯



☆ ☆ ☆ № ➊ Omnilogic Forum + More ☆ ☆ ☆

Your ad here just for $2 per day!

- - -

Your ads here ($2/day)!

Author Topic: Not every short man is a shortcel; not every shortcel is forever incel  (Read 720 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MSL

  • Философ | Philosopher | 哲学家
  • SEO Mod
  • SEO hero member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17758
  • SEO-karma: +823/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Peace, sport, love.
    • View Profile
    • Free word counter

Not every short man is a shortcel


Not every shortcel is a "forever incel"


  There are incels and noncels who think that every short male is a shortcel. Many short guys just self-proclaim themselves "shortcels" just because they're short (even before they try enough to find a girlfriend in order to make sure that they're incels for real).
 Obviously there are those short men who are not incels. Some of them are popular enough (like Danny DeVito or Eric Tsang) others you can see on the streets or on the news. Of course, there are short men who are incels. They're shortcels (sometimes called heightcels. In fact "heightcel" should be an umbrella term because a heightcel can be not only someone who is short but also someone who is too tall (i. e. a tallcel).)
 So, now after you understood that not every short man is a shortcel (and, of course, not every too tall man is a tallcel), let's see why do I think that shortcel doesn't mean "forever incel".
 During my JKD experience I met in the sport hall two short men. One of them was a middle aged uncle (maybe around 44 years old at that time) who was not only a JKD fighter but also a bodybuilder. He worked as a taxi driver or something like this and there were females who thought that he's attractive (at least physically).
 The second one was one of the instructors (sifu; shifu. In Chiinese - "师傅"). He was also one of the shortest there but he was skillful (not just in JKD but also in MMA) and later he found a second job, he graduated in a medical major. As far as I know he is a happy husband and father already and his wife is a shortie pretty young lady (the incels will rate her as a high-tier Becky).
 So, what useful conclusion we can made based on these two cases?
 1. When you are short but gymmaxx and moneymaxx you have some sort of attractiveness and there will be some women to like you.
 2. When you are short but gymmaxx, studymaxx and moneymaxx, you have chance to get married to a woman you like.
 Maybe some incels (especially those most nihilistic, blackpilled, pessimistic ones, who do not want to learn about the metapill or at least to be more redpill oriented) will think that they're too short and too ugly to ascend just via gymmaxx, moneymaxx and studymaxx.
 I would like to ensure them that especially the moneymaxx is very helpful and they don't need to worry but if they really think that they're too short and/or too ugly (shortcels and/or uglycels) to ascend just via these 3 maxx-es, I'll suggest them to add more -- for example, locationmaxx (in case you don't know what's that -- a short explanation: locationmaxx or geomaxx is to look for love in a country where the average woman is shorter. Good places for this are the countries in Latin America, South Asia, South-East Europe, South-East Asia and Japan).
 Popularitymaxx is also a way but it's not that easy.
A fan of science, philosophy and so on. :)

Gay

  • Just another internet fan
  • SEO Admin
  • SEO hero member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1981
  • SEO-karma: +334/-0
  • Internet knowledge
    • View Profile
    • SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION
Based.👍

Nadia

  • Сладко миньонче
  • SEO hero member
  • *****
  • Posts: 621
  • SEO-karma: +192/-0
  • Gender: Female
  • Миньонче
    • View Profile
    • СУ
Agree.
Mieux vaut être seul que mal accompagné.
 

Aquonut

  • SEO sr. member
  • ****
  • Posts: 472
  • SEO-karma: +469/-46
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Email
I think to get 'love', geomaxxing and gymmaxxing are the most two effective maxxing while studymaxxing and moneymaxxing just 'get' girls but not their loves.

Those LDAR shortcels just make an excuse from shortnesses for their lackadaisies and their lackadaisies bigger their shortness problems and a vicious circle is established so that they are 'trapped' in the plight, unless they realize it.

By Cartesian Doubt, as vividly demonstrated by his own clever analogy: How to know which apples are good and which ones are bad in a backet? Drop them all and you can know.

Applying it to those LDARers' ideology, we can break down it to three 'components':
1. Height is mo' important than body, money, status, etc., which isn't even necessarily true. Ntm there are opposite examples, height as the data have proven can be compensated.
2. Because height is important than them, it makes it reasonable to lie down and just rot from maxxing in them, which is not true at all either. They ignore there are countless things other than love, like living quality, and its of no need to elucidate how they matter in those things.
3. Just because you can't get love, you should LDAR, whose stupidity is beyond descripition. It is not even wise for love to be one of the meanings of one's life. In the perspective of Stocism, thrown here since I think it systematically and scientifically analyzes what should be the meaning of one's life, the meaning of life should comply with 'the Cardinal Virtues', and love doesn't comply with any of 'em.

So by Cartesian Doubt, kinds strenously, the analysis denounces their ideology as totally hogwash.

SEO

  • SEO master
  • SEO Admin
  • SEO hero member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7311
  • SEO-karma: +723/-1
  • SEO expert
    • View Profile
    • SEO
Very interesting thoughts. 8) 8) :)

MSL

  • Философ | Philosopher | 哲学家
  • SEO Mod
  • SEO hero member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17758
  • SEO-karma: +823/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Peace, sport, love.
    • View Profile
    • Free word counter
 LDARism and all the rest of the blackpillism's pessimistc ideas are harmful for the incels.
A fan of science, philosophy and so on. :)

 

Your ad here just for $1 per day!

- - -

Your ads here ($1/day)!

About the privacy policy
How Google uses data when you use our partners’ sites or apps
Post there to report content which violates or infringes your copyright.