Author Topic: Art (Read 48629 times)

SEO · « **Reply #120 on:** March 27, 2016, 11:22:03 AM »

Very good. I like it.

mojo · « **Reply #121 on:** March 28, 2016, 01:06:41 PM »

Non-SEO · « **Reply #122 on:** March 28, 2016, 01:57:01 PM »

Cool, but... why one of the yellow parts of this flower is a bit transparent? It shows that it's thinner or? What is the original idea behind it?

mojo · « **Reply #123 on:** March 28, 2016, 09:57:01 PM »

The idea is to suggest they are thin. Notice that not all of them are transparent. Only one, because it gives you the impression for all without actually doing all. Because you see one, you accept that all are that way.

Fooling the eye into believing is hard.

mojo · « **Reply #124 on:** April 05, 2016, 05:22:22 PM »

英语课 · « **Reply #125 on:** April 05, 2016, 10:16:41 PM »

WOW！！！

SEO · « **Reply #126 on:** April 05, 2016, 11:58:53 PM »

Very realistic mountain tops, sky, water, reflection... Admiration!

mojo · « **Reply #127 on:** April 07, 2016, 12:32:15 AM »

I'm afraid the background on this one I didn't do. It's a wallpaper from long ago when I was just getting my feet on the ground with this stuff. Wasn't at that time able to do the back grounds. That came later.

SEO · « **Reply #128 on:** April 07, 2016, 03:38:03 AM »

Ow, thank you for telling me that! Then maybe it's a background that is a real photo (photoshopped probably, because it's too clear to be 100% real)? Btw, the reflection (on the water) in the right side seems not real and this is why I guess it may be a digital product.

mojo · « **Reply #129 on:** April 09, 2016, 08:01:04 AM »

MSL · « **Reply #130 on:** April 09, 2016, 08:49:21 PM »

Construction or deconstruction? That's the question.

mojo · « **Reply #131 on:** April 09, 2016, 11:22:28 PM »

Quote from: MSL

Construction or deconstruction? That's the question.

This reminds me of some nonsense my mother always used to say which goes like this:

TB or not to be, that is the conception. Can consumption be done about it?

Of cough, of cough.

MSL · « **Reply #132 on:** April 10, 2016, 02:38:20 AM »

Sweet. But I really think that people's perception (interpretation) may be in two ways: some will think the parts are flying away (deconstruction); others will think the parts are coming to build up the woman (construction). And it's good that you created something that allows different interpretations. It's also useful as a sort of Rorschach test (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rorschach_test).
So, in a word, it's a philosophical and psychological art product. Its philosophical value I can compare with another one (which I also like): "Ceci n'est pas une pipe" ("This is not a pipe") --

^{By Image taken from a University of Alabama site, "Approaches to Modernism": [1], Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=555365}
More about it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Treachery_of_Images

MSL · « **Reply #133 on:** April 23, 2016, 04:00:14 AM »

A Cupcakes' Cups Tower

-- just a simple tower. Nothing special. I made it during the spirit disinfection. I know that disinfection does not necessarily kill all microorganisms (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disinfectant), but it's much better than nothing.

MSL · « **Reply #134 on:** May 02, 2016, 09:11:14 PM »

Pretty artificial flower

It is a pretty artificial hand-made flower from China:

.

By '萧雨'.

Omnilogy (Non-SEO and SEO) forum

☆ ☆ ☆ № ➊ Omnilogic Forum + More ☆ ☆ ☆

Your ad here just for $2 per day!

Your ads here ($2/day)!