[SEO]

A roulette topic

   A roulette topic is started here, in our omnilogy community. We love science and we love math... we love predictions and we love the omnilogic matter. So, it's time for a topic in this field.
 Well, a good article from Wikipedia first: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roulette
 Another good article from Britannica:  http://global.britannica.com/topic/roulette-gambling-game
 So, go on, please! And keep the Google AdSense rules! It's very important!

[Gay]

 I am telling you, guys, that the ball has no memory. Right, right?

[MSL]

  Yes, yes! The ball has no memory -- this is true! Does anyone pay attention to the screens that show where the ball landed last? Probably, many of us -- do! BUT, I don't think it's so necessary. Just learn more mathematics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematics) and you will see why. 

[SEO]

  Yes, yes! The ball has no memory -- this is true! Does anyone pay attention to the screens that show where the ball landed last? Probably, many of us -- do! BUT, I don't think it's so necessary. Just learn more mathematics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematics) and you will see why. 

I think this is very useful for all of the players (gamblers): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler%27s_fallacy "The gambler's fallacy, also known as the Monte Carlo fallacy or the fallacy of the maturity of chances, is the mistaken belief that, if something happens more frequently than normal during some period, it will happen less frequently in the future, or that, if something happens less frequently than normal during some period, it will happen more frequently in the future (presumably as a means of balancing nature). In situations where what is being observed is truly random (i.e., independent trials of a random process), this belief, though appealing to the human mind, is false. This fallacy can arise in many practical situations although it is most strongly associated with gambling where such mistakes are common among players."^{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License}

[Acerov]

So... what's this?

[Non-SEO]

  It is a thread for anything that has to do with the game called 'roulette'.

[Non-SEO]

  Have ever heard that theory? The 'betting the last number' theory. I'd like to comment on that 'betting the last number' theory. So, I think so -- even if it is correct (that 'every wheel has a slight bias"), this however, does not necessarily mean that betting the last number means you're going with the bias. Biases can be found when you collect the results of thousands or tens of thousands of spins, etc. So, my conclusion is that in the (very!) long term you will have a very slightly less disadvantage to the house. So, I do not recommend it, because practically it's nothing special.

[MSL]

 And don't forget to keep in mind that for European roulette, a single number wins 1⁄37 and loses 36. So I don't think that betting last number is better/worse than betting any other number from 0 to 36 (there are, in total, 37 numbers).