[MSL]

 But then you have to explain to the rest of us who is that man? Well, I'll do it. He was an American psychologist. The one who was like "genetics was solely responsible for intelligence". Geneticism (基因主义), you know...

[Alexa]

Ah, I see, I see. That's why he was so sure that the IQ is all genetic and the environment, learning, study and practice can't improve it. He just followed this his idol.

[Dimitroff]

Never give up. The efforts may bring fruits.

[英语课]

Yes.

[Ren]

Sure.

[Zhang Jie]

But then you have to explain to the rest of us who is that man? Well, I'll do it. He was an American psychologist. The one who was like "genetics was solely responsible for intelligence". Geneticism (基因主义), you know...

Yeah he is a differential psychologist and psychometrician, but his claims were all psychometrically sound and reasonable. I am not sure why you criticized him as a geneticist. He just told you the truth.
Btw I never said intelligence was 100% genetic. I said it was mostly genetic, which was in line with what arthur jensen said who actually never said intelligence was 100% genetic.
This scholar indeed has contributed a lot to psychometrics and differential psychology. I don't think you should treat him as if he was no one who should be taken seriously.

[Zhang Jie]

Ah, I see, I see. That's why he was so sure that the IQ is all genetic and the environment, learning, study and practice can't improve it. He just followed this his idol.

Well it was not related to that I idolized him at all. IQ is mostly genetic I never said it was all genetic, but learning or something else similar really can't improve your intelligence, AT MOST your IQ score. I think I have elucidated the reason.

[SEO]

Then why we see that most people who learn can become more intelligent?

[MSL]

 Because many colleagues of him also think so. The person is a good contributor but overestimated the genetics. The blackpiller of the IQ studies.😃😄
 Try to think why kids with same genetics have different intelligence if one of them is educated in university or army and another one is raised in the jungle.

[Zhang Jie]

Because many colleagues of him also think so. The person is a good contributor but overestimated the genetics. The blackpiller of the IQ studies.😃😄
 Try to think why kids with same genetics have different intelligence if one of them is educated in university or army and another one is raised in the jungle.

Of course his claims can be wrong since he is not a biologist but a psychometrician/psychologist. Gene studies are done by biologists and if he was wrong on the point of view of the genetic variance of intelligence then it was not impossible, but his psychometric points of view are really insightful and sound.

[MSL]

 Well, okay... Let it be.

[Incel]

So... I think it is interesting.

[SEO]

Your account was reactivated after the email change. Sorry for the late reactivation. Nearly 100% of the staff here is moving out of China and we're dealing with the abroad's things, but soon will be active here again.